Category: MakerBot

All things MakerBot! MakerBots, RepRap, and robots!

Fair wages for Robots!

Several hours ago I posted about two eBay auctions for full sets of Mendel printed parts.  I just checked on them to check out where the two auctions ended.  One ended at $446 (actually, at 330 Euros, for a seller located in Ireland) and the other at $455 (seller located in Ohio).

Why, then, would an auction just two days ago go for $630 (rather, 420 pounds)?  A sale at 420 pounds implies someone else was willing to bid 415 pounds.  I’m guessing it’s a combination of factors that went into a $600+ sale – perhaps because the English really want RepRaps, people wanted to support Adrian Bowyer, anyone who bought RepRap parts from Adrian himself can basically be assured they’re getting quality parts.

This tells me $450 seems to be the going rate for a set of Mendel parts (for now).  This raises an interesting conundrum.  Will the prices go up as more people become interested in RepRap?  Will the prices go down as people start printing and making available more RepRap parts?

Either way, suppose the going rate is $450 for 60 ‘bot hours.  That’s $7.50 an hour.  This is less than the minimum wage in California!1  This means if human help is required at all in the production of RepRap parts, the entire process is taking longer than 60 hours and the hourly rate is even lower than $7.50/hour!

I’m not saying RepRap parts should cost more.  I’m just saying I was really getting used to the idea of a gnome sitting in my living room earning above minimum wage while I slept.

Oh well, I guess I’ll just have to take solace in running a robot sweat shop.

  1. $8/hour right now [↩]

Optimal RepRap sizes

To my thinking there’s basically two optimal RepRap sizes (in terms of build area):

  • A small RepRap with a build area just large enough to replicate it’s largest part, one at a time
  • A large RepRap with a build area large enough to print all of it’s own parts in a single print job

Random tangent:  wouldn’t it be cool if all RepRaps came with the designs for their own printed parts already on board?  Just fire it up for the first time, calibrate, and start printing replacement parts.  (I realize this isn’t quite feasible – in order to be ready-printable the files would need to be in S3G format and the machine would have to run the STL’s through it’s own Skeinforge settings).

Printing a MakerBot

I’ve already pontificated on the idea that if you’ve purchased a MakerBot Cupcake CNC Deluxe kit, you basically get a second MakerBot for half off.  (Spoiler: it’s because you can print a ton of the most expensive parts that go into building a new one).  I don’t know why, but the idea of replacing wooden parts on my ‘bot with printed parts just fascinates me. 1

So, let’s have a list of potentially (and actually!) printable parts:

  • Electronics spacers
  • 3 large pulleys, 1 small pulley
  • Y stage, the entire thing, as a single print
  • X stage, in three large prints (there would be no need for the end caps if the three pieces were designed properly)
  • Insulating retainer ring
  • Printruder
  • Dinos
  • X stage end caps
  • Z stage captive nut guides
  • Z axis rod bearing brackets

Having more printed components for the MakerBot would reduce a lot of work in it’s assembly.  There’s a lot of tiny fiddly bits in the X and Y stages that would become obsolete.

Heck, it might even be possible to replace some of the bolts with some kind of printable fastener system.

  1. Cue Johnny Cash singin’ One Piece At A Time [↩]

Mendel FAIL

I can’t find my camera, so my camera phone will have to do. Here was my second attempt at printing Spacexula‘s Mendel production STL files.  Don’t even ask about the first attempt.

RepRap Mendel FAIL
RepRap Mendel FAIL

Spacexula offered some advice on how to fix this.  I have the Stretch feature turned on so that I can (hopefully) print better small circular features without the parts getting all globby.  He suggested turning Stretch off and just drilling out the holes if needs be.  Wise words from a man cranking out Mendel sets.

Unfortunately, I won’t have time to spent printing up parts until the weekend.  :/

These parts are not unusable.  Of the 13 parts on the sheet, I think five are probably perfectly serviceable.  The tall toothed gears are the most miserable parts – they are swayed and the teeth are basically intermittent bumps.  This has been one of my least successful completed prints in a long time.

Anyone want some Mendel parts?  Drop me a line.

My own plastic gnome

…or Minimum Wage Rights for Robots!

MakerBot posted a screenshot of a RepRap Printed Mendel Parts auction that sold for 420 pounds – roughly $630.84. 1  2  Others have been posting RepRap Mendel auctions as well.  One just sold for roughly $453, another for about $270, with two more auctions around $450 each with at least 3 more hours to go.

Using Spacexula’s Mendel production files, 24 STL sheets of parts, averaging 2-3 hours a print, we’re talking roughly 60 MakerBot print hours. 3  Assuming I only have the patience to print up one STL sheet a weekday and two sheets on the weekends, starting on a sunny Sunday like today, I could finish in 19 days.

Assuming very little human intervention, $600 for 60 hours of MakerBot operation is a pretty good deal.  It’s like having a fussy gnome who eats electricity and plastic living in your home and earning just above minimum wage for you. 4

  1. According to Google and at the time of this post. [↩]
  2. I couldn’t find a link to the actual auction at first, but then figured it must be a private auction.  It turns out this was the RepRap eBay auction posted by Adrian Bowyer a little while ago.  You might need to be logged into eBay to visit that link. [↩]
  3. This assumes no failed prints. [↩]
  4. You know, like those shoe gnomes that made shoes for the cobbler in that children’s fairy tale. [↩]

Help with a RepStrap alternative list

I’m trying to put together a list of all of the RepRap/RepStrap alternatives out there. 1  Later I’ll put up the list with links to their instructions and where to get parts.  Here’s what I have so far:

  1. RepRap – Mendel, Mini-Mendel, Darwin, McWire
  2. MakerBot
  3. RepMan
  4. ShaperCube
  5. Profound Devices
  6. Tommilese

Am I leaving any out?  If so, please leave a comment.

  1. Mind, this is just a list of those open source 3d plastic FDM printers, where the plans and instructions are available.  It’s not meant to include those machines people are building on their own or converting existing 3axis CNC’s into a RepStrap. [↩]

Replicating without a RepRap

I’ve read others writing about creating molds for pulleys and molded RepRap parts.  Is this something you do?  Several of the Mendel sets on ebay appear to be parts cast from molds.  This would seem to be a very cost effective and relatively quick way to replicate parts.

At the same time, I’m not sure just how useful it is.  The best thing about a RepRap/RepStrap is you can tell the robot to build you something while you go out for a beer or take a nap.  Casting molds (from the reprap.org link above) seems to be a more involved and detailed process require a fair bit of human intervention.

Given that a set of printed or molded parts are selling for upwards of $400, I have to wonder why no one has stepped up to create a huge mold with all the parts and just start stamping them out.

I also wonder – if everyone had all the plastic/reprap’ed parts they needed – what would the next bottleneck be?  Electronics?

Beco Block limitations

Having printed up and played with a big pile of Beco Blocks, I have come to the conclusion they are only about half of what I was looking for.  Mind, they are probably the more difficult half.

The articulated joints you get with Beco Blocks are absolutely fantastic.  The connect well, disconnect well, are very moveable, and reasonably poseable.  Unfortunately, it is very difficult to build a rigid structure with them.  After you play with the parts a bit they become even more mobile and less poseable – but this is to be expected.

So, how would one go about building a system of rigidly connectable blocks?  There’s the Construx way – of side/slide/snapping parts together.  Then, there’s the snap/push the parts together Lego way.

Something to think about.