
In continuing with my Doctor Who fanboy prints, I’d like to create a Time Lord Seal coin. Coins are cool. The BBC put up the design file associated with the Time Lord Seal from The End of Time.

In continuing with my Doctor Who fanboy prints, I’d like to create a Time Lord Seal coin. Coins are cool. The BBC put up the design file associated with the Time Lord Seal from The End of Time.
Nophead’s Mendel1 has produced 15 sets of Mendel parts, and is hard at work on it’s 16th!!! My understanding is that it would take about 60 hours to print a full set of Mendel parts. I have to admire anyone who prints up Mendel/Mini-Mendel parts because of the amount of dedication it would take to do so. After spending 90 hours2 printing something, I don’t know that I could part with it.
My point is that we really have guys like Nophead, Spacexula, and Cyrozap3 to thank for cranking out parts and pushing replication forward.
I hereby bestow upon you gentlemen the Duggar medal of continuous replication.
I’m not ignoring you, I swear. I totally misconfigured my “Contact” page e-mail form plugin.
That’s not the worst part – I contributed a big chunk of the code to that plugin and really should have known better.
So, if you’ve tried to send me an e-mail, please try again. :)
Building my MakerBot and getting it printing reliably was challenging, but totally doable by a technical novice such as myself. I have lots of people on the MakerBot Operators group to thank for their patience and help in getting my MakerBot online. 1 Looking back, I spent about a month building and then calibrating my ‘bot. 2
It’s easy for me to forget that first month of occasional frustrations and triumphant victories, now that I’ve been printing successfully for more than eight months. It actually makes me a little sad when I read people writing about their own frustrations and how they’re ready to throw in the towel. The most recent example was noobcake getting frustrated with her ‘bot and getting ready to sell it off in parts. Thankfully, Spacexula swooped in to help her out.
This brings me to We Alone On Earth‘s recent post. WAOE are a group of introspective, philosophically and technologically minded twenty-somethings. To give you you an idea of their frustration with their ‘bot, the post was entitled, “MakerBot: not very much fun at the moment (caveat emptor)” Yikes. 3 I realize that WAOE has revised their original post several times since the original publishing date – but they have a lot of legitimate concerns.
WAOE list off seven problems with the MakerBot. I’m not going to refute these points – but rather offer another perspective on them. After several updates, WAOE offer additional comments, I’ll include them here in “[]”.
A MakerBot Cupcake CNC kit is not for everyone – but the kit can be build and operated by anyone who is willing to invest the time to do so. It is a cheap, hackable machine that is literally going to be just as useful as you make it. Want less warpage, higher resolution, more reliable extrusion? You can buy an upgrade, build one from their plans, or design your own solution. 8 Want a CNC mill, CNC pencil, or CNC music box? Design the very first one! Then again, you don’t have to do any of these things.
A MakerBot kit is just a platform for your creativity. It’s just that big. 9
As for you, WAOE, if you want some help – drop me a line!

To the right is a first draft print of my latest designs for the sonic screwdriver. It’s next to a USB cable for scale and perspective. There are several things I need to fix:
I’ve posted my sonic screwdriver designs to Thingiverse for people to tinker with and, hopefully, improve. I would sincerely appreciate any help anyone can provide when it comes to designing the upper half of the sonic screwdriver – especially the moving parts.
Looks like MakerBot has been quite busy on the wiki of late. Clothbot just pointed out a new section on their wiki devoted to documentation for a 3D scanner called “Cyclops.” From the documentation they system appears to work by projecting a series of stripes onto the subject. An iPhone or similar camera then captures video of the object, and software extrapolates the size and shape of the object by detecting how and where the stripes fall on the object. From a cursory reading of the wiki, it looks like Cyclops is essentially a lasercut wood framework for mounting the camera and pico projector – with all the heavy lifting being done by software.
Nearly a year ago I saw a video for Qi Pan’s student project, called ProFORMA, where a simple webcam was used, without the need for lasers, special backgrounds, or projected stripes, to capture video and extrapolate a point cloud to create a 3D image of a physical object. Qi Pan’s page on the Cambridge website explains much more about the process and developments since it’s publication. (Spoiler: He uses math.) The video showing the video capture and scan along with some wicked augmented reality effects.
Ever since seeing the demo video (See below), I’ve been hoping a MakerBot 3D scanner would use this software engine. Apparently the only additional piece of hardware it would require would be just the webcam. On a slightly related note… a while ago I wanted to run my MakerBot in the other room but was too lazy to want to run back and forth to monitor it. Solution? I grabbed a webcam and clipped it to the Z axis platform. I could now watch the XY platform zip around as it printed.
Unfortunately, there’s been almost no discussion of ProFORMA since November of 2009.
However, I did notice a similar product called Vi3Dim. It appears to work similarly to ProFORMA – except that it requires a black and white checker pattern underneath the object to be scanned. 1 I was expecting it to be $529.99 or something, but it turns out that the software has a free demo and a full version for $20. At that price, you really could have a MakerBot webcam 3D scanner on the cheap right now. I haven’t tried it out yet, but their website says it can scan and export to a 3DS file, a fairly universal format. The demo is almost as impressive as the ProFORMA video. :)
What I like about both the ProFORMA and Vi3Dim scanners is that they:
Yesterday, just as an experiment, I tried to blog all of my the MakerBot related ideas and reactions. Here’s the result:
2252 words blogged in one day – NaNoWriMo, here I come!
I figure to upgrade my Batch 9 MakerBot to use a Plastruder MK5, I’ll need the following:
$106.00 isn’t too shabby to upgrade to the most badass Plastruder2 money can buy. 34
I’ve had a few ideas about how one can build a business around a MakerBot.
Well, here’s my latest idea. Small custom replacement parts. Not a new idea, right? Well, it’s all about the marketing and how you reach and pitch to your target market. Who is always out looking for small replacement parts? When they do, where do they go? What are their alternatives when they can’t find a replacement part?
I found the answers to all of those questions when I needed a replacement window latch. Here’s the business model:
What do you think?
Seriously, why “Tweet”? 1
If I had never known about Twitter and were asked to start a company exactly like it, I would have called it “Bleeter” instead. Anything you said in 140 characters would be a “Bleet.” And, best of all, the phrase “Follow me” would just make SO much more sense when you’re talking about sheep.